Potters Field Lawyer Denies “Child Abuse”…They Were All Adults…
Mike and Pam Rozell have been silent since the beginning of the scandal that overtook their Potters Field ministries, relying instead on “inhouse legal counsel” Sharon DiMuro to speak in their defense.
DiMuro also seems to be paying attention to critical press as she recently responded to a comment on the “Stop Mudman Burgers” Facebook page.
In response to an accusation of child abuse by the Rozell’s, this was her comment;
So… the defense is that there could have been no child abuse because everyone was of legal age to accept abuse?
In fact, many of the interns were not 18 when they were in the program, a fact that was pointed out to DiMuro by many of the comments following hers.
She, of course, did not respond to any of those.
I do not expect to see this legal wizardry on the next reboot of “Perry Mason”…
I digress…
What this does show is that Potters Field is paying attention to any negative media and is still utterly deaf and unresponsive to any of the allegations against them.
They are still sending out donor letters, however…
In the meantime Pam Rozell emerged from the Montana bunker long enough to get a new position .
She is now a board member of the Montana Hunter Jumper Association, which is “a community of horse enthusiasts formed in 1993 to promote opportunities for showing over fences for riders and horses of all levels and abilities”.
Ironically, “social media” appears to be one of her responsibilities.
Evidently, the horse jumpers haven’t checked out the latest social media on their newest board member.
Let’s hope that the MHJA will reconsider having someone like this representing what I’m sure is a fine organization otherwise…
I was 17! Just saying.
Also, I’m glad someone is acknowledging there WAS abuse lol
A sad bit of very dirty laundry – seems kind of clear these folk do not believe in a holy God or a judgement day… sigh
I was 17, turned 18 during training. Abuse doesn’t have an age limit. To think that it does is the only true case of “victim shaming” I’ve ever seen and is a truly disgusting way of excusing abuse.
Lawyers…pssshht! Wow…even if she were correct, which she obviously isn’t…I guess spiritual and emotional abuse is ok as long as it isn’t a child being abused? Wrong!
Amen, Mike, amen ! ! !
I question her wisdom or common sense on even commenting at all. And is she charging for each post she makes? Where did her retainer come from?
TNV…good questions…
Haha, no child abuse… like abusing 18 year olds is wayyyy better. Not even upset, that’s comedy gold though.
There were many young adults under the age of 18. I’m so angry. I can’t even it a sentence together
I can’t even put a sentence together
An intern under my guidance as well as three others were 17…. I’d be more than happy to corroborate all the details with that!