Becoming What We Worship: Duane W.H. Arnold, PhD
Becoming What We Worship
An old Anglican priest friend of mine used to speak of an “enlightened traditionalism”. By this he meant the faith of the Catholic Church as Anglicanism has received it, with reverence for Scripture and tradition, and a lively social conscience in its application. There was a time when such an enlightened traditionalism was valued on its own merits. Now, however, we would be mired in arguments as to whether such an approach was liberal or conservative as we have imported secular categories as doctrinal definitions.
Rather than being the salt of the earth or the light of the world, the process has been reversed as we have taken in the values of secular society, baptized them, and have given them a home in the house of God. This, of course, is idolatry. Moreover, it does not matter whether those imported secular values originated in the political Left or the political Right, or merely in the movement of society at large. The idol, whether fashioned out of gold or clay, remains an idol and is defined as such by those who give it pride of place in worship and devotion.
It has always struck me that when we read about Jesus overturning the tables of the money changers in the temple precincts we immediately make the moral of the story as one concerning the money itself. I think, however, we might be missing the point. “My house shall be called a house of prayer, but you have made it a den of thieves.” The anger was about the temple being used for a purpose that was alien to its singular and primary nature as a place of worship. Commerce could take place elsewhere… but not there.
As the Church there are priorities. I believe our top priority, preeminent above everything or anything else that we can do, preeminent even above works of mercy, is worship. By worship, however, I am not speaking just of the singing of hymns or being led in by a team of musicians in choruses. I am speaking of Biblical literacy and a life of prayer, both individual and in common with others. I would include in worship the hospitality and generosity of true Christian fellowship, as well as our life together at the altar. I am speaking of a worship that is Christo-centric. It is not, Christ plus politics. It is not Christ plus nationalism. It is not Christ plus societal sexual norms. It is not Christ plus the Second Amendment. It is not Christ plus theories – conspiratorial, racial or otherwise.
As a friend of mine said, in the end, we shall be what we shall be because we worship what we worship. Idolatry is the most grievous of sins not merely because it dishonors God, but because of what it does to us. We are affected at our very deepest being by what we pay homage to. In a very real sense, we become what we worship. To grow “to the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ” is to dispense with our imported idols and to worship him alone.

Duane,
“It is not Christ plus______________.” Thank you for a very thoughtful piece. I find it interesting that we are not learning from the recent past (the 50s-70s) when many Protestant churches fell by the wayside because of their devotion to different causes. That’s what my church was like growing up. I learned all about pop psychology, different religious systems, women’s lib, who to vote for (Democrat for the working class) and march in the streets, but Jesus was strangely absent. He was presented as sort of a papa hippie figure that we could relate to based on our common humanity, not his divine nature. Now we can meet him on a different, more conservative platform (I am being sarcastic, of course). As the old song goes, “Just Give Me Jesus.”
The church I grew up in no longer exists. Everyone moved away or dropped out. I don’t think most of them ever learned who Jesus really was, apart from that hippie dude we tried to relate to.
Linn,
Many thanks. Today’s evangelicals could learn from that recent past, but I don’t hold out much hope.
Duane,
I agree. We are not very historically driven unless it fits our current interpretation of events.
The pastor of my church made a comment yesterday that churches should never embrace the cause of social justice. At the same time, my church runs a tutoring program for underprivileged kids, is active in the pro-life movement, and a polling place for every election in our neighborhood. I don’t think he sees the conflict inherent in his statement. Social justice is not necessarily “liberal.”
Linn
People use “tags” not knowing what they mean…
I rejoice anytime I see the truth about the Church stated plainly and rightly! The Church was created BY Jesus, exists FOR Jesus, and her eternal destiny is to serve as the BRIDE of Jesus. Everything else is secondary and/or a byproduct of us fulfilling our intended purpose as the Church. I still encounter many shocked Christians when I point out that the Church does not exist for non-believers, it exists for Jesus.
Jeff
Many thanks. I think in many quarters what it means to be Church has been forgotten…
Would certainly answer my question as to why Christians don’t look like the Jesus we see in the Gospels.
I think the besetting sin of humanity is idolatry…and when we make what is truly idolatry into dogma, the church becomes something other than what God intends.
Success and nationalism are the idols before us today…
Michael @ 10:12
Be setting sin? Amen
Sadly people make up what pleases them, JWs and Mormons and Buddhism, etc. prove this theory….
Now I WILL learn to just lurk ( I hope)! ! !
Josh
Michael and I have had the discussion for years… “When does church cease to be church?”
Michael,
“Success and nationalism are the idols before us today…”
And when Jesus is placed along side the idols, he becomes ‘one among many gods’… almost a dictionary definition of paganism…
I think things like nationalism are obvious and need to be dealt with swiftly. However, I think we all may be more complicit in not keeping the main focus on the life, works, and words of Jesus.
Josh
The issues of politics and nationalism have been a part of evangelicalism for over a generation. I have my doubts as to how quickly it can be dealt with, assuming there is actually the willingness to do so…
That is true.
I think, too, that a distinction needs to be made between worship and evangelism. What is the purpose of the church—worship or evangelism? Seems we’ve made it more about evangelism than worship. I tend to think the focus needs to be on worship and let evangelism happen, primarily, outside the church. Again I said, “primarily” not “exclusively”.
Just my $.02
Very well done, Duane.
Your idea of “enlightened traditionalism” brought to mind the late John Stott. Though from a different part of your church, he talked about Christians being “radical conservatives” — keeping the Faith that’s been handed to us, and tossing out cultural religion and anything else that would keep us away from following Christ.
OfficerHoppy
I believe worship (in the broad terms I indicated) is primary, with evangelism being the outgrowth…
bob1
Many thanks. When I was a university chaplain, John Stott was part of our seminar series. Always admired his work on the Sermon on the Mount as counter cultural Christianity…