Jean’s Gospel: Church As Faithful Witness
Church as Faithful Witness
âBut when the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness about me. And you also will bear witness, because you have been with me from the beginning.
 I have said all these things to you to keep you from falling away. They will put you out of the synagogues. Indeed, the hour is coming when whoever kills you will think he is offering service to God. And they will do these things because they have not known the Father, nor me. But I have said these things to you, that when their hour comes you may remember that I told them to you.â (John 15:26-16:4)
To keep His disciples from falling away after His departure, Jesus told them about two specific things to expect. First, He and the Father will send to them the Helper, the Spirit of truth, to bear witness about Jesus. The Helper will work in and through the disciples who also will bear witness about Jesus.
Second, Jesus forewarned the disciples that just as the world had rejected His testimony, âwe speak of what we know, and bear witness to what we have seen, but you do not receive our testimonyâ (John 3:11), the world also will reject their testimony: âThey will put you out of the synagogues.â However, this rejection should not distress them, but comfort them. Rather than seeing rejection as a sign of their failure or error, the disciples should see rejection as a sign they are being faithful and truthful witnesses of Christ and His kingdom. As Jesus previously said: âA servant is not greater than his master. If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you. If they kept my word, they will also keep yours.â (John 15:20)
âAnd you also will bear witness, because you have been with me from the beginning.â (John 15:27)
Jesus established the credibility of His witnesses for all time. First, Jesus said âbecause you have been with me from the beginning.â In his first epistle, John elaborates on their credibility: âThat which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and have touched with our hands, concerning the word of lifeâ (1 John 1:1) The disciples were eye witnesses to the words and deeds of Jesus, especially His resurrection, which qualified them as credible witnesses.
The second fact which established the credibility of the disciples to testify about Christ was their Divine inspiration: âWhen the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come.â (John 16:13) The credibility of the apostlesâ testimony is present in both their oral proclamation, for example, Peter at Pentecost, and also in their writings contained in the New Testament.
Therefore, when Jesus says âbecause you have been with me from the beginning,â Jesus presents His apostles as unique witnesses who the Church and all Christian preachers must follow without contradiction. Throughout most of Church history, Christians have affirmed the unique testimony of the apostles in the Nicene Creed: âI believe in one ⊠apostolic ChurchâŠ.â This confession acknowledges that true Christian doctrine for all time is built on the unique testimony of the apostles. The unity, holiness and catholicity of the Church depend on the apostolic witness.
âThey will put you out of the synagogues. Indeed, the hour is coming when whoever kills you will think he is offering service to God.â (John 16:2)
Jesus forewarned the disciples that the worldâs reaction to their testimony about Him and His kingdom will be rejection. They will not be greeted with friendship or acceptance by the world. To the contrary, their preaching about a crucified Savior, who was raised from the dead and is presiding over a spiritual kingdom at the right hand of God the Father almighty, will be despised and mocked by the world, and they will be hated, banned, persecuted and killed.
So Jesus consoled the disciples with the promise of the Helper and told them their preaching will not be in vain: âAnd you also will bear witnessâ. The disciples will bear witness about Him; the Holy Spirit will convict the world (John 16:8-11); His kingdom will spread throughout the world; and the gates of hell will not prevail against it. Through the apostles and all preachers following in their footsteps, the Gospel will work itself into the world like a pinch of leaven, which is effective to leaven an entire batch of dough (Matt 13:33).
On the other hand, Jesus also taught the disciples that the majority of people will reject their testimony. It will not be Christians who put others out of the synagogues, but the majority (i.e., the unbelievers) who will ban the Christians. They will even do so in the false belief that they are offering service to God. Therefore, the disciples should not be dismayed by their rejection. The faithfulness of the disciples and the truthfulness of their testimony will not and cannot be judged according to human measures of success. The only thing which should concern Christian preaching is truthful apostolic testimony.
âBut understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty. For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, heartless, unappeasable, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not loving good, treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power.â (2 Tim 3:1-5)
Where is the apostolic Church today? Is our testimony apostolic?
Pastors in some churches can lose their position for holding to apostolic teaching.
Other pastors attempt to join the Church to another husband with their groveling before human rulers.
Denominations today have put apostolic teaching to a vote, where a majority has voted changes away from apostolic doctrine for the entire denomination.
Churches have bent, modified or wholesale removed apostolic teaching from their pulpits to appeal to the greater culture. Instead locating the power of the Spirit in the apostolic witness, some churches look for the Spiritâs movement through corporate marketing methods and/or entertainment.
âFor I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith for faith, as it is written, âThe righteous shall live by faith.â â (Rom 1:16-17)
Let us repent of the cultural influences which have infiltrated our churches and our minds. The power of the Gospel is in the same place it has always been from the beginning: in Christ and the testimony of the apostles passed down to us in Godâs Holy Word. In this Gospel, our Father grants us forgiveness, life and salvation for the sake of His Son, who gave His life for us. Jesus said: âThe wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes.â (John 3:8) May our churches steadfastly proclaim Godâs Word and Gospel in purity, and let the Spirit of truth work salvation where and in whom it pleases Him. Amen.
Good word. Some of this was Tozer-ish in tone.
Jean,
Nicely done… appreciated your conclusions.
Thanks Josh.
Thanks Duane. I finished this before your article from a couple weeks ago on the 4 marks of the Church, but thought it would make a suitable companion piece.
#4 Jean
Indeed… and a great intro to something else coming up…
The problem with this (because there has to be one, right?) is that almost all churches think they are recovering the “true” Christianity. Outside of following a hard regulative principle, and not doing anything except what is explicitly called for in the New Testament, finding the true locus of Apostolic Christianity seems impossible.
But a good directive none the less.
Josh
Could be wrong, but I think it has to be in the Creeds as a rule of faith.
(By the way, just scored tickets for U2’s Joshua Tree tour… you can start be jealous now…)
almost all churches think they are recovering the âtrueâ Christianity. <<<<
The Orthodox and the Roman Catholics do not believe we are recovering original (true) Christianity because we believe we have direct continuity with the original church and are in fact, the original church alive today.
Josh,
You make a valid point. However, some of the largest Protestant denominations, the Roman Catholics, and even many independent evangelical churches have made a conscious decision to move away from apostolic teaching on a variety of issues.
They use a variety of rationales: (1) additional revelation; (2) something was culture bound; (3) new and improved exegesis; and probably some other bases that I’m not currently recalling.
I purposely limit myself in articles like this (and last week) to biblical principles, allowing the reader to ponder, discuss and apply them, if they agree with the principle I am proposing, which I hope they do.
Xenia, as do some Independent Baptists. All can’t be the one true church.
Dune – beyond jealous. Sinfully envious.
I’ve seen them thrice. Last time was the Elevation tour…with Furtick..which is where he got his church name.
@9 – Jean – no doubt this is true. #2 is the most common reason I hear. (May have used it myself. Hope not.)
One other reason that I’ve heard is that the 1st century was the beginning of the church, but God intended for it to grow beyond that inot what is today.
Jean,
Good article – thanks.
For clarification – Apostolic teaching – I know it is something we all read and nod our heads – but what is it, or better yet, what do you mean when you say Apostolic teaching.
So many terms we have our own meanings and think we are agreeing.
Hi MLD,
#13 is a great question.
When Matthias was chosen to replace Judas I. as an apostle (to bring the number to 12), the qualification was “one of the men who have accompanied us during all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, beginning from the baptism of John until the day when he was taken up from usâone of these men must become with us a witness to his resurrection.”
So, rather than just “a sent one”, we are talking about “apostle” in that narrow sense when we talk about the apostolic Church or apostolic teaching.
From there we are saying that the teaching must be attributed originally to one of these apostles (Paul being the exception, because of his special revelation from Christ). But the early Church also played a role here. They sifted through many writings, including some allegedly bearing the names of the apostles, but under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, concluded which ones where authentic apostolic testimony and used these in worship. From there the canon developed, as well as the creeds.
Does that help?
It has been noted here previously that each member of this Body is tasked to spread the gospel, but these tasks vary, if I remember correctly … So? So, isnt it job one of the shepherds to take seriously our growth (we pew sitters), enabling our being open to the above noted Holy Spirit?
Is there today a chain of command that is above shepherd? I guess the R.C.s would say “Pope” is the trump shepherd, but ???
1st comment from my new Kindle … How do you folks manage so many cogent comments from these little gadgets? I’m impressed !and
Em,
“So, isnt it job one of the shepherds to take seriously our growth (we pew sitters), enabling our being open to the above noted Holy Spirit?”
Are you asking about “growth” as in our growth as Christians (i.e., discipleship), or are you talking about growing the total number of Christians?
Jean, from my frame of reference, growth of the Body always refers to spiritual growth – never to numbers of influence – but, I suppose strong Christians should result in the latter two in one way or another, eh?
Love my Kindle, but no more moments coming from it -I lose my that while typing ?
Sigh… “Numbers OR…’ Not OF…
Whether it was Jesus speaking with Nicodemus or Paul speaking to the Greeks in Athens, the Gospel is not a set of “reasonable” propositions that appeal to the “wise” of this world. In both of those cases, they did not mince words. It offends our old nature.
The minute the Gospel becomes something beautiful or appealing in the eyes of the world, you can be sure it’s not the apostolic Gospel. When that’s abandoned, then you no longer have the marks of the church. On the other hand, the Gospel is the most beautiful and appealing message to the one who is convicted that he/she is a sinner deserving of God’s wrath. This is the work of the Holy Spirit, working through the Word.
Jean, #19 – very important points IMHO
1 Cor 1:21 and 1 Cor 3:19 … remind me of the truth – the “fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom” for everyone – that said, IMV, it is so important to equip the Saints as it is the Holy Spirit that energizes both the Truth in us and the Gospel in this world…
(i am avoiding the subject of Apostolic truth, i know)
the old saying a person can be judged by the enemies he has can be applied to the Church and yet, how many times has that persecution card been played by wrong headed or motivated persons, too …
i know that i’ve made the observation before, but it is so clear that we have leadership (some are among the saved, i think) who have lost this fear of His holiness
from where i sit, the Church is stumbling along, never more indebted to grace than it is today…
So, is the way apostolic teaching is developed?
George Conger has been a long time Anglican reporters.
Re-baptizing those in gender transition?
http://anglican.ink/article/transgender-rebaptism-debate-general-synod-0
I meant to say George Conger is one of my favorite Anglican reporters.
MLD,
I will let our Anglican members comment specifically.
Whenever the issue of baptism comes up, one must take into account, not only whether or not the teaching is apostolic, but the following confession in the Nicene Creed:
“I acknowledge one Baptism for the remission of sins”
Jean,
Of course, you are correct. The craziness of what goes on, not only in the Episcopal Church, but now in the Church of England, cannot be defended, even when it is brought forward by someone whose intention in doing so (as this is so off topic), as to be suspect.
My view of what is apostolic has been best defined, recently, by Pope Francis – Christ as the cornerstone, the apostles as the columns, and their teaching as the source of a river that has flowed through history to our own time.
What we do here, and what you have done in your article, is to promote learning and respectful dialogue… not mere posturing.
Duane,
Thank you. I love the Pope Francis definition. I read definite allusions to Revelation. To the river flowing from the throne of God, and to the apostles, whose names are on the 12 foundations of the wall of the New Jerusalem. Very nice!