Mainstream: Duane W.H. Arnold, PhD

You may also like...

49 Responses

  1. richard says:

    a true depiction of our current state, but I think more due to the shepherd than the sheep.

  2. Duane Arnold says:


    I would tend to agree…

  3. Jean says:


    I think you have a point. I guess I would ask, then a church follow Paul’s teaching to “avoid”:

    “I appeal to you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught; avoid them. For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naive.”

    When a group departs from the Creeds and/or other historical, settled, doctrines of the church, when and at what point must a church “avoid”? And who is the party which is divisive?

    I agree whole heartedly that many churches have become a reflection of the broader society.

  4. Linn says:

    How much of this do you think is media-driven? i had a friend who participated for many years in the pro-life movement, and the media always centered on the guy in the cassock with the shaved head and the 200-pound cross, never the more “regular” people.

  5. richard says:

    and from that conjecture I would follow the trail to the seminaries and bible colleges that have strayed from the gospel and embraced, (at least partially), the world that surrounds them.

    an overemphasis on nationalism or sjw is leading the flock astray from the gospel, for both teaching institutions and pastors.

    it is my prayer that the pendulum will settle back to the middle after all the shaking stops.

  6. Duane Arnold says:


    I think both eccentric fringes (left and right, liberal and conservative) bear responsibility…

  7. Duane Arnold says:


    Much is media driven, but the media can only amplify what is already there…

  8. Duane Arnold says:


    “…it is my prayer that the pendulum will settle back to the middle after all the shaking stops.”

    I would agree, but my greatest fear is that this is not a swinging of the pendulum. It may be an irrevocable fracturing…

  9. richard says:

    I would agree, but my greatest fear is that this is not a swinging of the pendulum. It may be an irrevocable fracturing…

    I would think that any permanent fracturing would then be meant to be, as He Who Is In Charge has decreed that there will be a remnant, a number that we don’t know of those that try and stay true.

    and i don’t think appeasement is the answer.

  10. Em says:

    “irrevocable fracturing?”. carries serious implications for humanity’s time of Grace. …. Or so it seems to me. ….

  11. Duane Arnold says:


    Serious implications, indeed…

  12. Jean says:

    If the trajectory of modern society is increasingly atheistic, pagan and/or deist, then would it not be probable that the church will increasingly fracture as the temptation to placate the society for one reason or another swallows up more and more churches?

  13. Em says:

    Jean, if so these “Christians” don’t know the devil when he whispers his “logic” to them….
    sorrowful, sorrowful, sorrowful….. 😔

  14. Jean says:

    The devil doesn’t come carrying a sign or wearing a name tag that says “Prince of Lies.” The only way one can discern a lie is by knowing the Truth.

    True Christians know the Truth and His truth. He is not a host or guest on cable or internet news or talk shows, so you won’t find Him there.

    Truth doesn’t contradict Himself, so you won’t find him in churches which teach the faith and its doctrines in contradiction to the God breathed Scriptures.

    Truth is not a nation or political philosophy, so you won’t fin Him wrapped in a flag or incarnate in a government.

  15. Em says:

    God the Holy Spirit bearing witness with our spirits as we prayerfully, humbly study His Book….
    Self deception and ego are not Christian virtues!

  16. Just Sayin' says:

    A cursory glance at+/- 200 years of Methodism, Southern Baptists, TEC, and (though not mentioned in the post) Lutherans is instructive. The “mainstream” UMC is a denomination created and remade through theological/social fracture, repair, merger, and fracture again. “Mainstream” SBC culture is itself a turbulent result of a theology that condoned American slavery, only recently corporately begging forgiveness. The Episcopal/Anglican break is more recent but when would have been the “Golden Age” of Episcopalian unity and mainstreaming? The 1928 prayer book, nearly 100 years old now? Finally…American Lutherans…ELCA/Missouri Synod/Wels, anyone?

    After looking with just a bit of an extended historical lens, what can be considered “mainstream” (with connotations of relatively static harmony) is as much an imagined construction as is the idea that there exist unique unbridgeable divides today.

  17. Duane Arnold says:

    Just Sayin’

    No, there was never a “golden age”, but there was a time in which everything did not devolve into a knife fight…

  18. Steve says:

    Rather than transforming a fractured, divided and polarized society, we, as the Church, have become its reflection.


    Duane very well written artical that is true and sobering. One point about the church transforming society, I would disagree. I would argue that the church should be concerned about transformation of it’s own, however, not sure we can translate that to the society as a whole. The fact that the church resembles the world is not surprising. Maybe the church has taken on too much responsibility outside of it’s specific calling and in the process has become weakened.

  19. Duane Arnold says:


    Many thanks! In terms of society, I had in mind Matt. 5:13-14 with the idea that we are, I believe, to be something different than the society at large. We have become its reflection. Perhaps that is part of the weakness to which you correctly refer…

  20. Em says:

    Interrupting a good thread with apologies….. but waiting for a Michael update ? ? ?

  21. Duane Arnold says:


    No updates at present. When I hear anything I’ll post it in the Prayer and Praise thread…

  22. Em says:

    Thank you, Dr. Duane – I’ll check back later this afternoon.

  23. Xenia says:

    The Rise and Fall of Mars Hill

    A new podcast from Christianity Today. So far, fascinating!

  24. Steve says:

    Duane, yes I agree. The church is to be different than the world and that gets to the calling of the church which is to make disciples of Jesus and nothing more and nothing less. If churches can unite on this front, we truly could see it strengthened. It’s not about politics, social justice, nationalism, numbers or any other statistical measure. It is simply about making disciples of Jesus. There are those in the world fleeing to the church for refuge and they deserve our protection and there are those in the world trying to destroy the church which we need to be on guard against. There are also some in the world who see the church as a positive influence and want to join forces with the church in transforming society for the better. However, when the church joins forces with the world like this it is not spirit lead and the results are what we see today.

  25. Diane says:

    This podcast hits on all the things we’ve been talking about here for the past 20 years, not just Mr. Driscoll.

  26. Duane Arnold says:


    I tend to be very careful in making pronouncements as to what is led by the Holy Spirit and what is not. Often we have to wait and judge by the fruit that is produced.

  27. Steve says:

    Duane I was referring to the fractured, divided and polarized state of affairs in the church today. We don’t need to wait to determine this is bad fruit or do we? I suppose we can disagree on the causes though.

  28. Duane Arnold says:


    Perhaps “the fractured, divided and polarized state of affairs in the church today” constitutes the fruit. That, by the way, is a chilling thought.

  29. Jean says:

    The church has been fracturing and dividing since the 1st century. 1 John talks about those who have gone out from us.

    Jesus said, “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.”

    I don’t see the fracturing church as anything other than what’s been happening from the beginning. The devil doesn’t kick back when his kingdom is plundered by the Stronger Man. He fights tooth and nail to regain his former slaves.

  30. Duane Arnold says:


    Agreed, but what is currently taking place seems different in size and scope…

  31. Steve says:

    Jean,. I seem to recall you once telling me that the devil doesn’t have a kingdom, only God does.

  32. Em says:

    Not an authority on this, but i think the sword Jesus referred to was the Church at the mercy of the world…. for a time….

  33. Jean says:

    Steve, Paul calls it a domain of darkness. He calls the devil a prince. Jesus calls him a strong man. I don’t recall denying the devil has a kingdom.

    Em, where did Jesus and the apostles cause division? Where did the Reformers cause division? Against the followers of who in the Pergamum church, did Jesus threatened to come against them with the sword of his mouth?

    It happens mostly between people who claim to be the people of God.

  34. Steve says:

    Satan does not have a kingdom. He is called a prince of demons and a prince of the power of the air. But, all authority in heaven and on earth has been given to the exalted Jesus (Mt. 28).

    Jean, that was your direct quote from Feb 24th.

  35. Jean says:

    Steve, I don’t recall the context of that comment.

    It’s true that all authority has been given to Jesus. He is the stronger Man (the only One strong enough), who plunders the house of the strong man. But there remains a strong man.

    Moreover, God is sovereign over all creation, including the ancient serpent. Yet, the serpent still lies and deceives.

    However, all humanity outside of Christ is a servant of the devil.

  36. Steve says:

    Jean, the context was about your interpretation of the apostles creed where God rules in 2 different ways in 2 spheres (creation and kingdom). I didn’t understand your sphere dichotomy.

  37. Jean says:


    If Jesus is going to judge the world in righteousness, He must have authority over the world. If He is God, sovereign over all creation, then He rules over the world. In one kingdom, humans will be judged under the law for their deeds. In the other kingdom, believers in Christ will be judged righteous by faith. What is so confusing?

  38. Steve says:

    Jean, you are now calling the spheres kingdoms. Now you have mentioned 3 kingdoms when you include Satan’s. I was more on board when you only had one. 😀

  39. Jean says:

    Satan has a kingdom, but not sovereignty. He It’s a sub-kingdom. There are also human kingdoms.

  40. Duane Arnold says:

    On topic… worthwhile reading this from Tim Keller.

  41. Jean says:

    Great article Duane.

  42. Steve says:

    Duane, good stuff. ‘

  43. Duane Arnold says:

    “Social media drives extremism and mutes moderates. It magnifies and empowers the voices of those at the political and cultural extremes of Left and Right, while stifling the voices of those in the middle.”

    Good takeaway from Keller…

  44. EricL says:

    Excellent article, Duane.
    “While extremists can only gain status and belonging on-line, moderates (rightly) fear saying something that will anger others and jeopardize their career or relationships.”
    The extremists have no qualms about going “nuclear” with every argument because they have little to lose and much to gain, while moderates have a life beyond the internet that they would rather maintain and protect so they would rather back away from the online bullies of both sides.

  45. Steve says:

    Duane, this just dawned on me. When, we talk about mainstream and the Middle maybe its not about the content as much as it is about the demeanor. There are certain things that just by the nature of us being Christian puts us outside and some would like to label us as fringe and radical simple for having an orthodox belief. There are some hills I will die on if forced but most things are not like that.

  46. Duane Arnold says:


    All some people have is their rage (usually expressed online). Most of the rest of us have “lives”…

  47. Duane Arnold says:


    To go to the fringe, Right or Left, you usually have to “pass a test” that goes along the lines of “What do you think about __________” (fill in the blank) and you pass or fail. Moderates understand that one can be very much aligned with other people without walking in lock step. Much of the time it isn’t about content, it’s about attitude…

  48. Jean says:

    Fringe thinkers, according to the article, would deny they are fringe. Being fringe would not be good for their identity and self esteem. So they become loud and aggressive, over participating on social media to give the impression that they are the large voice, not the small voice. That accounts for the disproportionate volume of fringe tweets.

  49. Muff Potter says:

    Good observation Dr. Arnold.
    Normal people have known this since time began.
    You (generic you) do not have to be in lock-step with everything on the right or left.
    I hold to the tenets of the Apostle’s Creed as non-negotiable parameters up front.
    The rest of the stuff after that?
    I pick and choose as I see fit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.