Remembrance Day 2019: Duane W.H. Arnold, PhD

Remembrance Day 2019

What we now call Veterans Day, was once known as Armistice Day or, I think more appropriately, Remembrance Day for truly it is a day to remember and reflect.

On Monday, 11 November 1918, at precisely 11:00 am, the guns of the Western Front fell silent.  In the Western capitals of Paris, London and Washington, there was anything but silence as crowds spilled on to the streets.  In London, it was estimated that over a quarter million people filled the streets. The cities, darkened for four years, exploded into light.  They were celebrating the end of what they believed would be the “war to end all wars”.  

There was, however, a different feeling in the trenches of the Western Front which zig-zagged their way from the Swiss Alps, across northern France and Flanders to the North Sea and the English Channel.  The feelings there were more of those of relief and exhaustion.  One young American officer (my wife’s grandfather) wrote home to say, “The silence was deafening, none of us could really believe it was over…”

Between the years 1914 and 1918 the nations of the world would mobilize some 61 million men in their armed forces.  Of that number, over 9.5 million would die and 18 million would be wounded.  France would lose 700,000 homes destroyed and 20,000 factories, together with 50,000 kilometers of roads and railways made unusable and 4.5 million acres of land devastated.  Even in 2019, some land is still considered too dangerous for development. The US, a late entry to the war, sustained the deaths of over 100,000 in the space of a year, with over 300,000 wounded.  By the end of the war, the government of Russia had collapsed and a Bolshevik regime had been established – a regime which would be responsible for the deaths of more than twenty-million of its citizens in the two decades that followed.

When the Great Powers met at Versailles in 1919 to bring peace to a war torn planet, they thought it would be possible to guarantee tranquility through the humiliation, not the reconciliation, of Germany.  Justice was denied the defeated and compassion was withheld from the vanquished.  Germany was left impoverished and resentful, a breeding ground for nationalist extremists.  The seeds of hate were harvested in Poland and France a generation later.  In 2019, we still live with the failures of Versailles and the later decisions of Potsdam which built upon them.  The real cost of the First World War, in terms of human tragedy, is inestimable.  

Yet, it is interesting to note that the First World War, was among the most “Christian” of modern wars.  Germans marched to the front with the slogan “For God and the Fatherland” stamped on their belt buckles.  In Moscow, the Patriarch spent 14 hours blessing troops as they marched past the Cathedral of the Annunciation.  In Paris, a French priest reported to the newspapers that he had a vision of St. Joan of Arc leading the garrison militia beneath the Arc de Triomphe. In England, recruitment posters appeared bearing images of St. George, Christian Crusader knights and angels bestowing laurel wreaths and the “crown of life” on the brows of fallen soldiers.

Amazingly, this continued even after the realities of war were encountered.  Even after the appalling losses of the Somme and Verdun where over 600,000 died; even after the carnage of cavalry charges against machine gun emplacements; even after the release of mustard gas above the trenches; some continued, even then, to consider the war a “great Christian adventure”.  As always, the generals had promised a “short and quick war”.  Lord Kitchner spoke of the “Christian duty” to volunteer – and from 1914-1916 over 2,467,000 Britains answered his call.  

For most at the front, however, the idea of war being a “Christian adventure” slipped away as the casualties mounted.  Many came to believe that God had little to do with the holocaust they encountered.  In the real world of mud, blood, boredom, fear, endurance, carnage and mutilation, the soldiers at the front learned to live and survive under appalling conditions with a mixture of faith, stoicism, bravery and humor much more impressive than the innocent heroics with which the war had started.  To survive, that is, until they were killed, wounded, cracked under the strain or finally went home with their questions of faith tucked behind their relief of having survived at all.

So, we are left with the question, “Where is God in the face of war?”.  Some would say that in war God has abandoned humanity to its own devices and folly.  Some will say that God is on the side of the right, but in war all claim to be right.  The theologian Paul Tillich served as a chaplain in the German army in the First World War and was plagued with this very question, “Where is God?”. Finally he resolved that God was not distant, nor had God abandoned mankind, nor had God taken sides, but that God was there in the midst of the conflict – in the midst of death there was always the promise of life.  In as much as God has revealed himself to us, it has been in the form of one dying a painful and excruciating death on an instrument of torture, the Cross.

Yet, what are we as Christians to say of war itself?  If the First World War introduced the concept of “total war” we have, in the past century perfected the concept.  We even have a new vocabulary of “shock and awe” and the sterile “collateral damage” with which we describe or justify our actions.  It was not a pacifist, but the commander of the British forces in World War I, Field Marshall Earl Haig, who said, “It is the business of the churches to make my business impossible”. Yet, in the present era, the churches are increasingly either pushed to the sidelines or, sadly, caught up with the jingoism and nationalism that carry within themselves  the seeds of conflict.

So today, November 11, we should take a moment to remember.  Yet as we remember, let it be with sorrow for the lives taken from us and those irretrievably altered by these wars that seem to go on without end.  More than mere remembrance, let us also pray and resolve to work for peace in our generation for the sake of generations to come.  

In his famous sermon, “The Unknown Soldier” Harry Emerson Fosdick, himself a veteran of the First World War, made a pledge to the soldier of Arlington “known only to God”.  We might consider joining our pledge to his.

I renounce war. I renounce war because of what it does to our own men… I renounce war because of what it compels us to do to our enemies… I renounce war for its consequences, for the lies it lives on and propagates, for the undying hatred it arouses, for the dictatorships it puts in the place of democracy, for the starvation that stalks after it. I renounce war… O unknown Soldier, in penitent reparation, I make you that pledge.

Duane W.H. Arnold, PhD

The Project

You may also like...

20 Responses

  1. richard says:

    i encourage readers to look up “the war prayer”
    written by Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain).

    it was written, I believe, around the time of the US civil war.

  2. Duane Arnold says:

    Richard

    …And Siegfried Sassoon’s, “They”…

  3. Em says:

    Wars and rumors of wars continue… Interestingly (or not) the first home we bought had a “war bride” from France on one side and a German on the other side… The French woman was afraid of birds that flew too close, the German sat glued to her TV when the series Victory in Europe was broadcast. She said she rooted for Germany as she watched….
    Today on the news i see that Gaza had a heavily armed military parade vowing to destroy Israel… and how many here would volunteer to join an army formed to throw the drug cartels out of Mexico (and the U.S.)?
    As the song says, “march into hell for a heavenly cause..”
    Whose god, whose heaven? Come soon, Lord Jesus, come soon….. ?
    We won’t have the longed for peace on earth until the King of kings returns, but….
    Renounce war anyway, it can’t hurt. ?
    God keep

  4. ( |o )====::: says:

    Link for “The War Prayer”
    https://youtu.be/IRVod4PwQHs

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_Prayer

    End the folly.

  5. Martin Luther's Disciple says:

    Bring home our troops — from everywhere. We have no business being on or in foreign lands.

  6. Duane Arnold says:

    At one point, I could endorse the “just war” theories of Augustine and Aquinas. Over the last ten years, however, I have become less certain. The first condition is that of a properly established authority waging war… Congress has not made a declaration of war since 1941. Secondly, it is to be waged for a “good and just purpose” and not for self-gain… like oil, regime change, etc. Peace is to be the aim, not continuing conflict… the “mission accomplished” of two administrations ago, seems not to have been accomplished. I’m rethinking a good bit…

  7. bob1 says:

    Bring home our troops — from everywhere. We have no business being on or in foreign lands.

    Looks like “Bone Spurs” Trump is your man, then.

  8. Martin Luther's Disciple says:

    bob 1 – you may have a long list of reasons we should have troops all over the world. I can’t think of any.

  9. Em says:

    it all began when Harry Truman divided Korea and we became the world’s police… that just doesn’t make sense… reconstruction was one thing, but we aren’t – ahem – Daddy War Bucks

  10. ( |o )====::: says:

    “Bring home our troops — from everywhere. We have no business being on or in foreign lands.”

    MLD, I agree with you, completely on this.

  11. Jean says:

    “Bring home our troops — from everywhere.”

    This assumes that America can survive and prosper independently of the rest of the world. In my opinion, America cannot enjoy prosperity and peace independently, that is wholly self-sufficient, self-reliant and self-supporting.

  12. Martin Luther's Disciple says:

    Jean, how do other nation’s do it without docking their Navy in Boston Harbor, or having 100s of fighter jets and bombers scattered at several of our air bases?

  13. Jean says:

    MLD,

    Some nations do it by bribing other countries for access and influence. China is really good at that. Some nations do it by offering dirt cheap labor and natural resources. Think South East Asia, Africa and South America. Some countries do it by mooching off other countries. Some countries do it by military intimidation. There are a lot of strategies.

    I happen to think that ethics-based multi-lateralism is the best method. Nato and Western Democratic values has been a great success, and recalibrated to make sure everyone pays their fair share is IMO preferable to every country for itself.

  14. Martin Luther's Disciple says:

    I’ll ask again – so why are there no German Navy fleets allowed to establish in Boston Harbor? Wouldn’t that help them (or the French) to “survive and prosper independently of the rest of the world”?

    Anyone else here besides me and G think that 70 years is long enough in Korea?

  15. Jean says:

    You’ve got my argument backwards. Placing a navy in another country is not an act of independence, but of interdependence.

  16. Martin Luther's Disciple says:

    you are right – I did have that part wrong. So I will ask, for Germany’s need for interdependence do we allow them to set up military operations in the USA – as we are set up in Germany?
    Why do we need to be there but they are not allowed to be here? Why don’t we stay at home and be on call and let them double or triple their fighting force to pick up the slack?

  17. Jean says:

    We can talk conceptually, but neither of us being experts in the field nor having access to all available information, classified and non-classified, we rely on others who have been called into the relevant vocations to answer those questions.

    In my opinion, the NATO build up of the 80s under Reagan, including positioning of American intermediate range nuclear missiles in Western Europe, was decisive in bringing about the collapse of the Soviet Union preserving peace in Europe.

    The risk of “stay[ing] at home and be on call,” is that Russia can pop in and take a piece of land, like Crimea or a piece of Georgia, before we could possibly react. This moves countries and peoples from potential markets, frieds and allies, to capital and labor used against us (or at least not being available to us).

    Why the German or French navy is not here is because we don’t need their ships here. We have two oceans as a buffer and naval resources that we perceive as adequate, plus our nuclear deterrent. However, would could IMO certainly use their (and other allies’) ships to help in other areas of the world.

    I am in favor of robust defense alliances where the commitment in dollars and manpower is more equitably shared than in the recent past. But I think it is disastrous for America in the long run to break our alliances with S. Korea, Japan, NATO, etc. for a loner or isolationist strategist. Hopefully, before the damage is irrevocable for Amerrica, we can remove the current disaster, President Bone Spurs, from office one way or another.

  18. Martin Luther's Disciple says:

    The fact that we are almost 20 yrs into a worthless war in the Middle East – that benefits no one but the military industrial complex should be enough to warrant “we are going to sit out the next couple of wars.”
    Let the EU and Scandinavian countries fill the gap. (I know, the Scandinavians are probably a part of the EU). Let the Netherlands get their nose dirty in Crimea if that concerns you.

    But you are right, we don’t know all the backroom deals and payoffs etc that the USA entities make to keep all of these illegitimate wars going for more than our entire lifetimes.

  19. Duane Arnold says:

    Just for the sake of clarity, for decades the Scandinavian countries have done the “heavy lifting” when it comes to UN peacekeeping missions around the world. I know this as my wife was an executive with the UN agency tasked with training peacekeepers while we were in NYC…

  20. href="https://fud-cheat.com/modern-warfare-cheat-hack">Modern Warfare hack says:

    Just a general reminder — no names mentioned but you know who you are — that has been repeated before. The limit on the number of all-caps words in comments is THREE. If commenters continue to push the envelope on this rule (which avoids the appearance of you SHOUTING at others, I will delete the comment entirely.xIgnored

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Phoenix Preacher

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading