“What Would the Early Church Do?”: Duane W.H. Arnold, PhD
“What Would the Early Church Do?”
Duane W.H. Arnold, PhD
It was late in the afternoon—gray light slanting through the windows—when someone asked me in an email, “What would the early Church do if it were faced with policies like ours?”
It struck me that this was a question we should all be asking ourselves.
They were referencing government policies. Policies, I should add, that target the poor and the elderly with neglect. Policies that cage the alien. Policies that punish children for being born into the wrong zip code, or the wrong side of the border. Policies that, if we are honest, bear little resemblance to the Gospel and much to the machinery of empire and the pursuit of power.
Now, I’ve spent most of my life reading the Fathers—preaching with them, teaching about them, holding their words alongside Scripture, not as equal, but as honest voices from those who stood nearer the beginning. Men who knew what it meant to live in the shadow of power, and yet to follow Christ.
So I thought about the question—not as a slogan, not as a social media flourish—but seriously.
What would the early Church have done?
We know the answer. We’ve just grown uncomfortable with it.
They would have acted.
They did act.
They cared for the poor when the state wouldn’t. They welcomed the stranger when the culture recoiled. They resisted policies that crushed the weak, not with riots, not with slogans, but with a quiet defiance grounded in Christ. They did not cozy up to power. They stood at a distance from it, often at great cost.
Take John Chrysostom. Golden-mouthed, yes, but more than a preacher—he was a scourge of the powerful and a comforter of the poor. Preaching in Constantinople, he said to those gathered in their fine robes, “You see Christ in the chalice but not in the beggar lying at your door.” He wasn’t looking to make friends at court. He was calling the Church back to Jesus.
Or Basil of Caesarea. The empire watched people starve while the granaries of the wealthy burst with grain. Basil didn’t write polite letters to officials. He preached, “The bread you hoard belongs to the hungry. The cloak in your chest to the naked.” Then he built what would become the first public hospital. They called it the Basileias. No government grant. No imperial approval. Just Christians acting like Christians.
The truth is, the early Church didn’t rely on imperial favor. Most of the time they lived without it—or under threat of it. And still, they fed, clothed, healed, and took in those no one else would.
Even their enemies noticed.
Julian the Apostate—the emperor who tried to drag Rome back to paganism—looked at the Christians and said, “These godless Galileans not only feed their own poor, but ours as well.” You can almost hear the frustration. He wanted paganism to win, but couldn’t deny that it was the Christians who did the work. Not the temples. Not the philosophers. The Church.
Would anyone say the same about us now?
Dionysius of Alexandria, writing during the plague, told of Christians who nursed the sick and buried the dead while the rest of the city fled. “They were heedless of danger,” he wrote, “and took charge of the sick, attending to their every need.”
They didn’t do it because they had good policy. They did it because they had a Gospel.
Gregory of Nazianzus saw the poor and the refugee not as burdens but as kin. “They are made in the image of God,” he preached. “They are our brothers and sisters.”
There’s no asterisk there. No exception for citizenship status or political convenience.
This wasn’t an ideal. It was how they lived.
It’s fashionable in some circles now to say that the Church should stay out of politics. That Jesus didn’t criticize Caesar. That Paul didn’t march in the streets. But that’s not the point. They weren’t silent, and they weren’t passive.
They didn’t place their hope in empire, but they were not indifferent to injustice. They lived as those already belonging to another Kingdom. And they let the politics of that Kingdom shape their lives here and now.
When the Gospel is lived out fully, it will always unsettle the powerful and comfort the broken. And that is precisely what happened in the early Church.
So, if we’re wondering what to do—if we’re wrestling with the injustice written into law and policy—I would say this:
Be the Church.
Feed those the government ignores.
Shelter those the system casts out.
Speak when others are silent.
And refuse—absolutely refuse—to bless what is anti-Christ.
We don’t need new ideas. We need ancient courage.
That’s what the early Church would have done.
That’s what the Gospel still demands.

timely and spot on. “We don’t need new ideas. We need ancient courage.” Perfect summation.
fil
We know what Jesus would do. We know what the early church would do. It’s really that simple…
Amen
Such a nice post, Duane! There are so many things Christians can do that aren’t even controversial-volunteering at the food bank, visiting the elderly at a skilled nursing facility, driving someone to an appointment, helping with forms, school supply drives. I participate in many similar activities and many friendships have formed because of them. Even better-people come to know Jesus!
Linn,
Indeed. The point is, we can “do” something, rather than being bystanders in this truly terrible time…
I will do whatever I am able to do. I am usually able to take time to pray, which seems to be today’s most neglected and important thing.
JD
To be the church, we start on our knees… Prayer is not an added extra, it’s essential.
Duane,
It is a truly terrible time. I actually had to go no contact with the news cycle yesterday because I was getting too upset (I’m better today).
Linn
In the morning I listen to NPR headlines. I then read the New York Times summary. After that, I listen to music. I then check the news again in the afternoon. A constant barrage of news is not helpful, at least not to me, especially in this time…
Duane,
I’m also listen to NPR and check headlines. I think I will cut out the afternoon feed, and just make sure we’re all still on the planet in the evening.
Thank you, Duane (and Michael).
Reading this article reminded me Steve Brown’s talk on his radio show this week. His point is that after a big hurricane in Florida that affected a whole lot of people, the ones who stayed and helped rebuild were the Christians.
“…atheists do not build hospitals unless they’re crazy. Agnostics don’t visit prisons to speak words of hope. People who are unbelievers do not minister to the existential needs of our culture. … when the dust had settled, they all left. … and you couldn’t find them, except the Christians. Weeks and months and years, they (the Christians) stayed, and they helped and they encouraged and they used hammers and nails and build things back and they were almost, without a single exception, people of faith who were there because they were people of faith.”
https://www.keylife.org/programs/key-life/if-its-true-its-verifiable/
I agree with your Duane, but I think what first be dealt with is a false gospel – that our country (or any) has some kind of covenant or special dispensation with God.
As long as we’re force-fed the mutation, like how Mormons added extra so-called gospel teachings, we accept American economic and political theory is equal to even “taught” by the Bible, we won’t get anywhere.
UnCCed
Absolutely—and I think you’re naming something vital. Before we can respond faithfully, we have to name the distortion.
There is no national covenant. Not with America, not with any state. That idea—a kind of political supersessionism—is not only false, it’s dangerous. It confuses civic identity with Christian identity, and it allows the language of Scripture to be co-opted for the sake of statecraft, not salvation.
When we begin with the assumption that God has some special pact with our nation, we end up justifying nearly anything in the name of providence. War becomes holy. Markets become sacred. Borders become altars. And somewhere in the middle of all that, the Gospel gets lost—or worse, twisted into a weapon.
You’re right to draw a parallel with the mutations of Mormonism, not to disparage people, but to clarify the point: when something is added to the Gospel—whether it’s new scripture or political ideology—we no longer have the Gospel. We have a counterfeit.
Moreover, as long as we baptize American economic or political theory as if it were biblical truth, we’ll never be able to critique it with the authority of the Cross. We’ll be too busy defending Caesar to speak for Christ.
So yes—before we can act like the Church, we must think like the Church. That means recovering the scandal of a Kingdom that is not of this world, a Lord who was crucified by the state, and a Gospel that has nothing to do with national glory.
That’s where the early Church began. It’s where we must begin again.
YES exactly!!!
As usual, VERY well said.
And I’d like to thank you for your usual patience and non-superior attitude, unlike those I continue to encounter.
They, who weren’t in Iraq, who dont continue to lose bros from suicide, who haven’t been homeless, who don’t live with disease and disability, all from military service, yet THEY give themselves experts status on patriotism and run me out of churches because the VA advised us to coddle angry civilians rather than respond.
I wasn’t trained how to play fight or pout, so I have to leave another church building which uses my flag up front, all because I refuse to swear allegiance, sacrifice, or pray to anyone, but Jesus.
If I or any of my bros got some of that bank bail out $ (including $30M bonuses) we’d be better, I think.
I maybe could’ve gone to seminary like I wanted. Maybe then with my CIB and Mdiv I could explain how Jesus ALONE is King, and not be attacked.
Oh well, at least I get to read and interact with Duane…when I’m not “faking” one of the many medical issues I have (officially we were faking for 10 years, all 500k of us, until they had to admit all the evidence).