Jean’s Gospel: The Finger of God
“Now he was casting out a demon that was mute. When the demon had gone out, the mute man spoke, and the people marveled. But some of them said, ‘He casts out demons by Beelzebul, the prince of demons,’ while others, to test him, kept seeking from him a sign from heaven. But he, knowing their thoughts, said to them, ‘Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and a divided household falls. And if Satan also is divided against himself, how will his kingdom stand? For you say that I cast out demons by Beelzebul. And if I cast out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore they will be your judges. But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.’ ” (Luke 11:14-20)
One of my favorite metaphors for depicting God’s power and activity on earth is finger of God. As a figure of speech, finger of God is simple yet evocative, and it communicates many of God’s attributes. Before Jesus adopted this metaphor for His own ministry, Pharaoh’s magicians used it to point to Israel’s God for the plagues they were unable to replicate (Ex 8:19). In the 16th Century, Michelangelo masterfully incorporated this metaphor into one of the greatest fresco paintings ever created: The Creation of Adam, which adorns the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel.
One easily could say the metaphor finger of God is theologically freighted. Let us explore this metaphor and the various theological themes it conveys. If you have additional or different impressions, please share them in comments following the article.
- God’s power is awesome and asymmetrical in comparison to all created beings and powers. By this small appendage and with the lightest touch, God is more powerful than all our adversaries. God’s sovereign will is unthwartable. By His finger, God saves us.
- God is in touch with His creation. God is not absent from or disinterested in his creation. In Jesus, God came down and joined himself to creation, taking on our flesh. Incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the Virgin Mary, the Word was made man. In this way, the finger of God became more than just a metaphor. This finger became a physical, historical reality in the Son of Man, Jesus Christ.
- During his earthly ministry, Jesus wielded the finger of God, redeeming and healing people, sometimes by His physical touch and at other times by His powerful Word which touched the hearts of His followers. Jesus cast out demons; forgave sins; healed the sick; gave sight to the blind and hearing to the deaf; caused the mute to speak; and raised the dead.
- After His ascension, the finger of God continues to redeem and heal people to this day through His ongoing ministries of Word and Sacrament, by which the Church proclaims the forgiveness of sins through faith in the atoning death and resurrection of Christ for all people. A touch by the finger of God illumines our hearts with faith, opens our ears to the Gospel, and enables us to confess that Jesus is Lord. “He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.” (Col 1:13-14)
- The finger of God encompasses the work of the one Triune God, which being of one essence, yet are three distinct persons, namely the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, the glory equal, the majesty co-eternal. Note that in Matthew’s parallel account, Jesus equates Holy Spirit with the finger of God: “But if it is by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Matt 12:28)
- The metaphor of a finger, which does all these great works, reminds us that in Christ and His Word, illuminated by the Holy Spirit, we receive grace, knowledge and a saving relationship with the Father; however, much of God and His providential rule over creation remain hidden from us. It is as if in our earthly lives we are given to know just the finger of God. No doubt, our finite minds are incapable of comprehending much more than His finger. As Paul acknowledged: “Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!” (Rom 11:33)
“For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known.” (1 Cor 13:12)
Yet even though our present knowledge and understanding of God is incomplete, Jesus gives us two promises: (1) we are fully known to Him, which is far more important than our infinitesimal knowledge of God; and (2) when it is our time to join the Church Triumphant, we will see Christ face to face; then we shall fully know. In the meantime, may we be content with just His finger, while giving Christ thanks and praise for suffering and dying on the cross to set us free from sin, death and the devil. Amen.
Lord, Jesus Christ: “Purify me with hyssop, and I shall be clean; Wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow. Make me to hear joy and gladness, Let the bones which You have broken rejoice.” (Ps 51:7-8 NASB) Amen.
When I survey the wondrous cross
On which the Prince of glory died,
My richest gain I count but loss,
And pour contempt on all my pride.
Forbid it, Lord, that I should boast,
Save in the death of Christ my God!
All the vain things that charm me most,
I sacrifice them to His blood.
See from His head, His hands, His feet,
Sorrow and love flow mingled down!
Did e’er such love and sorrow meet,
Or thorns compose so rich a crown?
Were the whole realm of nature mine,
That were a present far too small;
Love so amazing, so divine,
Demands my soul, my life, my all.
To Christ, who won for sinners grace
By bitter grief and anguish sore,
Be praise from all the ransomed race
Forever and forevermore.
Isaac Watts, When I Survey the Wondrous Cross


Thank you for these comforting words Jean. What a powerful and merciful God we have. We are fully known to Him, although are knowledge of God is very small. Jesus is really all we need to know about God. Amen.
“Lord, I believe; help my unbelief’ is the best any of us can do really, but thank God it is enough.”
– Buechner
Nice, Jean
“History is a story written by the finger of God…”
C.S. Lewis
wonderful and deep – pay attention to the hand … of God … all He needs is one finger to control the universe? thinking, thinking… thank you, Jean
Thank you Joel, Duane and Em.
I am intrigued by Michelangelo’s incorporation of the finger of God into his Creation of Adam. It is imaginative and evocative, but we could not say it’s literal per Gen 1-2. I’m not bothered by that, but some might be.
Following up on prior discussions of books, movies and music, if we take the art form of painting as a medium of Christian art, how much leeway does an artist have to put on plaster or canvas what is written in Scripture? Are the rules different today than they were in past centuries? If so, why?
Jeans asks some very excellent questions in #4…
How much leeway?
Maybe as long as what is communicated ultimatelyTrue despite some particulars being a bit off?
Are the rules different? I’m not sure there are any rules now.
#4 Jean
I spent a bit of time in Finland with some Orthodox iconographers and was surprised that while there were set rules for composition and symbols, there was also room for individual artistic expression – hence, we can “recognize” work by Andrei Rublev, for instance. In the west, individual manuscript illuminators, from the Book of Kells on, can also be recognized, but the symbols remained the same. By the time of the Reformation/Renaissance, I think all bets were off. It was the overall power of the piece of art, not its accuracy. A famous example is Michelangelo’s statue of David… he’s not circumcised! Today, there are no rules… (at least none that I know of!)
J.I. Packer:
“Whatever we may think of religious art from a cultural standpoint, we should not look to pictures of God to show us his glory and move us to worship; for his glory is precisely what such pictures can never show us. And this is why God added to the second commandment a reference to himself as “jealous” to avenge himself on those who disobey him: for God’s “jealousy” in the Bible is his zeal to maintain his own glory, which is jeopardized when images are used in worship.”
Thoughts anyone?
Joel
The EO concept with icons is veneration, not worship. In this they follow the writings of John of Damascus (On Holy Images). The basic argument is that since the incarnation, we accept that physical things can lead us toward the spiritual in that the incarnation sanctifies the creation as a whole.
^^^ What Duane said.
Thank you Duane and Xenia.
Lutherans are pretty much the same way. We recognize the difference between worship of an image vs the recognition of the image.
The command is against worship. Right after God gave the command he ordered the craftsmen for the tabernacle and the instruments to carve images.
At the incarnation God made an image of himself. This is where the Reformed erred in the Reformation by ridding churches of statues, stained glass and anything else – they even tossed decorated pulpits.
JoelG,
I love Dr. Packer and I understand his position, but MLD has rightly stated that this is where my Reformed brethren jumped the tracks in my opinion.
Michael,
Yes I’m reading “Knowing God” and it’s very helpful and easy to understand for the common man. That chapter is a little confusing, though.
#8
one might consider the possibility that, historically, images served a purpose – back in the years prior to the printing press, the years before the common man had access to his own copy of God’s recorded words to us, before the darned Scottish Presbyterians thought that literacy was of use to all of us… before the common man was deemed worthy of his own copy of the Book…
all that to say that i think Dr. Packer’s point is valid – i would trade all the art work ever created with the hope of showing us God for just one of the times that the majesty and holiness of God was realized by my cluttered mind as i read the Book – study the Book; is that a work of the flesh? hope not…(study to show thyself approved unto God a workman that needs not to be ashamed… rightly dividing the Word of Truth…)
I know this is off topic, but can anyone tell me about 4Philemon at Emergent Watch. I’m a nice person and post what I believe is the truth (thus my name) but this jerk won’t post ANY OF MY SINCERE comments at his blog! What kind of a so called “discernment blog” does that?!! No one has ever done that to me. What a LITTLE man.
Not sure, but I bet he’s a guy who owns a blog and can run it however he pleases.
Just a guess.
I’d get over it.
Em,
I think Dr. Packer had good intentions in warning us. Perhaps the unintended consequence of this view of the 2nd Commandment is the stale look of modern evangelical churches. I got a kick out of this article:
http://babylonbee.com/news/discarded-pallet-hoping-second-chance-life-church-stage-decoration/
When I have visited Catholic churches I am blown away by the beauty of the art and architecture that, IMV, adds to the reverence of God.
Truth Lover,
I know he writes nasty articles about me…and I know he’s the one paying for the site, writing for the site, and he has the right to do as he pleases, when he pleases with the site.
That’s what I know about emergentwatch.
JoelG,
In St. Pierre’s in Geneva (Calvin’s church) they have excavated under the church…where you will see the heaps of things Calvin ripped out of the church.
They wanted the focus on the pulpit alone…because that’s where the Word came forth.
I’m not at all convinced it was wise…
while i have never visited the glorious churches and cathedrals of Europe in person, they, like many churches of the previous centuries here in the U.S. make me think of the dedication and skill (and, hopefully, reverence) of the men who created them…
there is great beauty there and an expression of man’s view of God’s majesty…
that said, i think that i must line up with Packer in that nothing, absolutely nothing created by man can or should ever rise to level of an expression of who God really is… i say that even tho i do find Jean’s meditation of the ‘finger of God’ very worthwhile
p.s. to my comment above @21… Jean’s meditation turns to Scripture for substance, does it not? the glorious “Creation of Adam” would not, of itself, give us the understanding of the symbolism
The Tabernacle and Solomon’s Temple were both designed and built to both show and show off the glory and majesty of God.
Where do we get that this is no longer true?
Thanks for your insight on Emergent watch Michael and Josh the Baptist. I know I’ve seen his name on here before too. Why are so many ODM’s wack jobs?!! Yet ignorant Christians believe them.
Truth Lover,
When you become convinced that your sect and yours alone is the receptacle for “truth” every one else is a liar and an enemy of truth.
They generally have no knowledge of church history and only a rudimentarily understanding of theology.
Their faith is in certainty…and thus certainty is the hill they will die on.
Sorry about my snarky remark, Truth Lover. I’ve never heard of that blog. Doesn’t sound like one I want to visit.
Josh the B. Thanks for that.
#20 Michael very interesting.