What Would The Confessing Church Look Like Today?

We have so many discussions ongoing concerning the the church and politics, but we have very little clarity on what that should actually look like.

In 1934 a group of German Protestant pastors and theologians put forth “The Barman Declaration” setting forth the “confessing” churches opposition to the growing threat of Hitler and the Nazi Party.

What should the church be declaring today in the face of growing authoritarianism?

With this piece in The Dispatch, Paul D. Miller gives us some of the clarity we’ve been lacking.

“It’s a relevant question for the American church in 2025. Whether you are on the left or the right, it is tempting to see ourselves as living through Germany in 1933, confronting the moral equivalent of the Nazis on the other side. There is a moral clarity to it, stark lines dividing the good guys from the bad. Our duty is obvious; the only question is whether we can muster the courage. 

But the analogy can be misleading, and it excuses us from examining our own side. We should be able to spot injustices from both sides of the political aisle.”

After giving a short, but lucid historical background, Miller says:

“That seems the right question for our time too. American Christians seem divided over who the good guys and bad guys really are and what the historical analogy should teach us. To some, the secular progressive left is the obvious modern equivalent of the Nazis: allowing a Holocaust on the unborn, fostering an authoritarian culture on campuses and in newsrooms, demanding the state’s validation and endorsement for every excess of the sexual revolution. To others, President Donald Trump and his MAGA movement are the baddies: preaching belligerent nationalism, demanding absolute loyalty to a singular leader, subverting the rule of law, and rewarding political violence.

What if both groups of Christians are right, in a way? It isn’t hard to find bad guys: They’re all around us. But if we recognize that there isn’t a single bad guy, bad group, or bad party—but many of them—we should hesitate before thinking that we are living through 1933. Maybe the calling of the American church today isn’t to mount a heroic resistance unto death against a singular moral evil that unites all people of good conscience in opposition. Maybe the calling of the church today is to recognize injustices and evils all around us, to maintain our independence, and above all to be an advocate: not for one party or the other, but for lawfulness and peace among political tribes.

I think this is very well said…

Christians who vote for Republicans are called to be salt and light within the Republican Party. That means being a voice calling the Republican Party to obey the rule of law. Yours should be the loudest voice condemning Trump’s pardon for January 6 rioters and pushing against his challenge to the checks and balances that are supposed to constrain the executive . You should speak up in favor of the poor and powerless and against the culture of cruelty, spite, and vengefulness Trump cultivates. It corrodes our public square and demeans our shared citizenship even as it poses more specific dangers to those targeted by Trump’s weaponization of federal law enforcement. If you do not speak up, you are both credulous and culpable, complicit with the party’s sins—including those yet to come.

If you vote for Democrats, you are called to be salt and light within the Democratic Party. That means calling on the Democratic Party to heed “Nature and Nature’s God.” The secular left sometimes gives off an odor of being godless, rootless, power-hungry moral relativists. They deny transcendent truth one day; the next, they announce a new truth, and their online mob will bully and harass us for failing to jump on their latest cause de jour. Their lack of moral foundation is exactly why they turn into moral authoritarians, certain of their own newfound truths—about race, class, and gender—and impatient for their fellow citizens to catch up. Open, tolerant, classically liberal government cannot survive without foundations, and Thomas Jefferson was right to point to nature and nature’s God as the right ones when he penned the Declaration of Independence. Natural law is transcendent, but not sectarian; it is a shared foundation on which believers in any religion or none can stand together.

There is more to this, I highly commend this article to you to read in it’s entirety.

Many thanks to our friend who sent this our way as well…

You may also like...

5 Responses

  1. Kevin H says:

    This is so good.

  2. Michael says:

    KevinH,

    I thought it so as well.

    It allows for involvement, but also the necessary separation between the two spheres.

    I also doubt that it will gain any traction…

  3. Linn says:

    The article helped me understand why I have felt so conflicted lately. I don’t support abortion except in cases of possible death of the mother or incest and I’m not pro-LGBTQ lifestyle at all, but I am also convinced that people should not be treated as subhuman. I believe in being kind to immigrants and developing a policy that is sane, not vindictive. I’m constantly straddling the middle. The article encouraged me to look for like-minded people, and continue to ask God to act in a way that glorifies Him and His love for people, not what either the extreme left or right preach.

  4. Michael says:

    Linn,

    Well said as always.

    My prayer is that we can create a place here for like minded people…calling out the extremes for what they are and encouraging all to think and act in a way that glorifies God and emphasizes his love and His righteousness.

  5. Linn says:

    Michael!

    I like that!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Phoenix Preacher

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading